British needed money for their war debt, and the colonies were a perfect place to obtain this much neededd money. They also instigated riots against the British while trying to control them in order to obtain popularity. Insert a link to a new page. Patrick Henry and Thomas Paine were important figures in American history, not so much because of their concrete actions but because of their rhetorical innovations. Zinn also states, “The war had brought glory for the generals, death to the privates, wealth for the merchants, unemployment for the poor.
Zinn pointed out his ideals quite well. Before the Revolutionary War, there had been political and economic conflict in the American colonies, but the conflict was mostly between the rich and the poor, not between America and Britain. In the end the leaders of the Revolution were men such as John Hancock and George Washington who were far well off then the men they were enlisting to fight with them. While the British were tightening control on the colonists, it gave them another reason to not direct their hatred to the “important colonists” but rather the British themselves. He argues that racism is not natural because there are recorded instances of camaraderie and cooperation between black slaves and white servants in escaping from and in opposing their subjugation. But, they had been planning on doing this as well to fifteen other wealthy colonists. He talked about how the anger and jelously of the lower class in the colonies was thrust against the upper class.
Zinn argues that the troops themselves also opposed the war, citing desertions and refusals to go to war, as well as movements such as Vietnam Veterans Against the War.
Zinn portrays the wars as being racist and imperialist and opposed by large segments of the American people. In addition, Zinn says i the countryside, Download this Chart PDF.
Themes and Colors Key. A number of colonists began to write pamphlets to inform the people of the idea of Independence and a Republican government, or at least some freedom from Britain; one such person was the infamous Thomas Paine.
In Boston, by contrast, the Stamp Act attacked the economic security of the working, middle, and upper classes; in response, the working classes staged riots and demonstrations against the British.
Zinn states that, “there was a large-scale riot The Stamp Act was a widely unpopular piece of legislation and the colonial leaders used this as a focal point to build on their revolution.
Due to the endless amount of support, Zinn successfully portrays his case valid. He is absolutely right, the rich colonists saw an opportunity to acquire more power and wealth for themselves and so they curved the attention of the angry mobs of the poor for their own benefits. This act against British jn, was lead by some meber of the Sons of Liberty, and proved that putting their anger towards Britian instead of each other would help them obtain freedom that they desperetly wanted.
By emphasizing abstract equality and ignoring real-world htesis, the Founding Fathers were able to gain the loyalties of many American colonists without surrendering any of their power or property.
This mobilization was in the favor of the upper class because it made them seem caring, while really they used these British taxes to shift the anger off of them and gain power by leading the revolution.
Throughout the chapter, Zinn’s explanation of lower class revolt in the American colonies gives a strong case towards Zinn’s initial argument that if the anger of the internal conflicts within the colonies were to be diverted to the British, the “important people” of the colonies could have taken political power, profit, and land in a legal fashion from the British.
Zinn writes that President James Polk agitated for war for the purpose of imperialism.
“Tyranny is Tyranny” by Mahum Riaz on Prezi
Inwhen the Seven Year’s War ended, and with England victorious, the British put more effort into taking control of their colonies in North America. They may have all rhesis from the middle and upper class but they knew they couldn’t just stand around, they tgesis to take a stand for what they believed in and it certainly was not the unnecessary taxing of simple imported goods that made the lower class have a tough time just getting by. All sorts of riots and rebellions broke out aganist the British led by lower class citizens as time went on turning the any sort of anger that those citizens may have had off the upper class citizens.
The American Pageant Student Website. This was not purely deception; it involved, in part, a genuine recognition of lower-class grievances, which helps to account for its effectiveness as a tactic over the centuries”.
After all, they were completely separate from Europe and were able to live contently without any help. So, after the war, there was a need for money, due to their debt and this increased the hatred between the classes.
Zinn proposes his case that the hierarchies in the English colonies could take over land, income, and political power of British interest by diverting feelings of hatred toward the upper-class of the British colonies and directing them toward the British government. Zinn states that the colonists needed the English rule less and less as time progressed, and that motivation for expelling the British would be the banishment of the Native Americans, whom the British chose to ally with.
In many words, he simply discusses the way in which important people from the colonies “changed the blame”. Now the lower class were not the only ones who rioted against the Stamp Act, the rich did too. Zinn is trying to show that if the colonists uprooted British politicians, than American politicians could make way.
An Analysis of A People’s History of the United States by Howard Zinn Essay
How about receiving a customized one? In the end the leaders of the Revolution were men such as John Hancock and George Washington who were far well off then the men they were enlisting to fight with them. The fact that rich people could opt out led to more rioting: Thus, leaders like Samuel Adams encouraged the working class to be moderate, rather than rioting again.