This does not have to be the final client; it can be an internal client such as another department or another level in hierarchy. Same as options 1 and 2 but you may emphasise on how you established that it was the best solution and why. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: This second post focuses — quite logically — on the second stage and will examine each section of the Case Study step by step. Then briefly list the 2 to 4 options that you considered. As I explained in the first part of this series of three articles, writing your Case Study should advance in three stages:. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
Notify me of new comments via email.
Case Study – Part 1: Selecting your key issue. « APC Tips
Please be aware that this post is not an official RICS guidance. Risc candidates select two keys issues because it enables them to demonstrate a broader breath of experience while being able to analyse their options and choices in details. As with every written work, start with an introduction sentence such as:. Using abbreviations and acronyms is generally not recommended but if you must, remember to incorporate a glossary or list of abbreviations.
If you select a project in which corners were constantly cut, it is very unlikely that you will have dealt with your key issues in the manner expected for the purpose of your APC. When do I need to start thinking about my Case Study?
Guidnce can download the amended template that I have produced here: Then review them one at the time remembering that you want to demonstrate your level 3 competencies providing reasoned advice.
I recommend that you tackle this section in two steps. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Write the whole of your Case Study using the first person and active verbs. How did you mitigate this risk? This will provide tuidance assessors with additional evidence that you have successfully resolved your key issue.
RICS APC – Delivering in Your Final Assessment
A key issue that occurred because of your own naivety or negligence would be definitively best avoided. As a rule of thumb, I would recommend discussing your Case Study with your Counsellor 12 months before your final interview.
Small low-profile projects attract the same challenges that major projects and require the same set of skills. Why did these results lead you to reject this option? Obviously your key issue s must be related to the competencies listed in the pathway guide and you must demonstrate at least two competencies at level 3. Focus on the key points that impacted on your decisions to consider and reject or adopt your options.
I have also added syudy couple of optional additional pages that you may want to consider. Maybe one option that your client rejected? If you would like to prepare the detailed plan of your Case Guidanec with our APC trainers and discuss with them your key issues and options, we offer one-to-one mentoring sessions either face-to-face Manchester or London only or via Skype.
Once you have your short-list of projects, you need to consider all the challenges that you have encountered during your involvement. In this section, you just need to explain what happened next. You are commenting using your Google account. As the headings and sub-headings must be included in your word count, you may sttudy to choose between listing your options here or stating them under the next series of sub-headings to keep to the word limit.
A candidate is not expected to know everything in their chosen pathway.
In this section, you just need to explain what happened next. You may discuss a single key issue if it was particularly complex and enabled you to apply a range of level 3 competencies.
This is the most challenging section for many candidates and yet, probably the most important one. First describe the outcome, then explain how you achieved it. Once you have your short-list of projects, you need to consider all the challenges that you have encountered during your involvement. Inserting a table listing the advantages and disadvantages of each option is not satisfactory. This does not have to be the final client; it can be an internal client such as another department or another level in hierarchy.
Out of those, in which ones did the team generally follow industry best practice?