During the oral the examiners should seek to establish whether all the requirements for a thesis submitted for the relevant degree have been met as set out in Chapter 8, pages , of the Academic Regulations [PDF KB] and to establish that the thesis is genuinely the work of the candidate. These recommendations should not be indicated to the candidate in advance of the oral, which is an integral component of the examination. Your supervisor is responsible for arranging the viva and keeping you and the Research Degrees Office informed of these arrangements. Further information on the conduct of the examination is provided in the guidance notes sent to examiners with the thesis. Please ensure that you or your supervisor s make it clear if your thesis needs to be dispatched to an address that is not your examiner s home institution.
It is expected that each examiner will write their report after reading the thesis but before conferring with the co-examiner about it. If nominating two external examiners, please enter the details of the lead examiner in the section for examiner 1 on the nominations form. Option c — pass subject to major amendments — is the outcome that should be specified when the corrections required are more significant in nature, including the re-writing or re-structuring of significant parts of the thesis and the clarification of arguments. The Research Degrees Office can provide information on companies that provide a thesis binding service, but offers no guarantee that the work will be carried out to the University of London specification. Once the Research Degrees Programmes and Examinations Board has approved your examiners please see our page on the nomination of examiners for more information about this process , the Research Degrees Office will formally invite your examiners to act.
The Research Degrees Office will contact you by email to invite you to act as an examiner. Examiners must contact the Research Degrees Office if they are contacted by the candidate, or if they receive a copy of the thesis directly from the candidate or supervisor. After the viva, your examiners will inform the Research Degrees Office of the outcome. Please note that extensions will be considered only if you can provide evidence of your satisfactory progress to date and ability to submit within the requested time period, and will be approved only if the Dean for Research determines that:.
Major amendments must be completed within 9 months though a shorter period may be specified by the examiners and certified by both examiners before the award can be made.
Request permission to transfer to writing up status
Unless it is impossible for them to do so, it is expected that the original examiners will examine the candidate on re-entry. If, for sbumission reason, it is not possible for the reports to be returned within two weeks of the oral examination, one of the examiners should contact the Research Degrees Office to discuss the problem.
Candidates should pay particular attention to the declaration on pages of the examination entry form. The following two options will be considered by the Research Degree Programmes and Examination Board: Please read the guidance notes on extension request form below carefully before requesting an extension.
Thesis submission and the viva – Academic Registry and Council Secretariat
The joint report should be on a separate sheet and should submissiom the following: We do NOT accept spiral bound copies. Monday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday The revisions required might include re-conceptualisation of and amendment to the arguments and conclusions of the thesis, and additional research work may need to be undertaken.
Students are given a paper receipt to confirm date of thesis submission. Students who have received financial support from external funding bodies such as Research Councils should acknowledge this according to the format stipulated by their funding body.
If you will not be able to work on your research programme at all for period of time it may be more appopriate to request permission to interrupt your studies. Research Councils require the following to be included on the appropriate page: Examiners should not consider option g unless they have first submjssion and rejected as inapplicable the preceding options; and should not consider option h unless they have previously considered and rejected as inapplicable all the previous options Reporting the decision.
Examiners should be experts in the field of the thesis but not qqmul in all parts of the precise topic. The board meets monthly to consider applications received in the preceding month, according to the schedule in the table below.
Please note that these dates are subject to change. The amendments will usually be typographical in nature, but may also qmil minor changes to the text to improve explanations or descriptions. Examiners external to the College may claim reasonable travel and other expenses.
All matters relating to the examination are confidential and examiners should not contact any third party, frm than the supervisor as provided for in the regulations and this guidance.
In summary these are: The email must be sent before Acknowledging support Students who have received financial support from external funding bodies such as Research Councils should acknowledge this according to the format stipulated by their funding body. Typically the preliminary report identifies particular areas which the examiner believes should be explored with the candidate during the oral examination, and, if possible, makes an initial recommendation, based on an assessment of the thesis, for the result of the examination.
Individuals who have retired from academic positions at Queen Mary University of London or another higher education institution may be appointed as internal or external examiners if they remain active in their field of research. They thrsis inform you of the outcome of the examination at the end of the viva, but are not required to do so. You must not contact the examiners yourself.
Information for examiners of research degrees
Examiners should not consider option g submissipn they have first considered and rejected as inapplicable thesiss preceding options; and should not consider option h unless they have previously considered and rejected as inapplicable all the previous options Reporting the decision Examiners are required to complete the Outcome of Examination form indicating which of the available decisions they have made and write a joint report giving the grounds on which their decision is based.
Please note that extensions will be considered only if you can provide evidence of your satisfactory progress to date and ability to submit within the requested time period, and will be approved only if the Thrsis for Research determines that: Your examination may be declared invalid if you do. Organisation of the oral examination The supervisor is responsible for arranging the oral examination.