Following the issue of results, concerns were expressed by schools that were unhappy with their results. Again, we were content that their grading decisions were appropriate. Request a different format. It will help us if you say what assistive technology you use. In response to those concerns, in October Ofqual reviewed the available technical evidence provided by CIE in July. PDF , KB , 9 pages.
We were aware that on one paper Paper 2 there were only four marks between grades C and A. The award was more severe and so more in line with GCSE standards than in , but there was no evidence to suggest that CIE had tightened the award beyond what was intended and beyond the usual adjustments that exam boards routinely make on the basis of post-award evidence. Summer awarding Awarding is more difficult when cohorts change significantly. Ofqual monitored the awarding of the elements of this specification in summer and reviewed the awards in autumn in the light of concerns expressed by some schools. Again, we were content that their grading decisions were appropriate.
IGCSE English First Language – 0522 – Grade Boundaries
Again, we were content that their grading decisions were appropriate. Summer awarding Awarding is more difficult when cohorts change significantly.
Reviews of summer awarding Following the issue of results, concerns were expressed by schools that were boundarirs with their results. Dedicated to Chris Lightfoot.
News story: CIE IGCSE® First Language English: Summer | WISE Tutors
Tom Scoville, 10 February We’re seeking to fill a number of volunteer roles. WhatDoTheyKnow also publishes and archives requests and responses, building a massive archive of information. CIE continued to tighten the standard coursewori grade C.
Awarding is more difficult when cohorts change significantly. During the grading period, CIE coursewrok us with copies of the evidence they were using, and we held several meetings with them via telephone during 022.
As in summer, CIE provided us with the evidence they were using and we discussed this with them. Historically, the grade widths on this paper have been narrow but they were narrower by one mark in than in the previous year. Any dissemination or copying of this email or attachments is strictly prohibited unless you are the intended recipient or are responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient.
For example on Paper 3 there were 10 marks between the boundary marks for A and C and on the coursework component there were 12 marks between A and C. They make grading decisions more difficult, as a change of just one mark can affect a significant proportion of students. PDFKB9 pages. Below is the exam of which the grade boundaries I am enquiring: Narrow grade widths provide particular challenges during awarding.
If you use assistive technology and need a version of this document in a more accessible format, please email publications ofqual. By 14 April, Education News. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.
News story: CIE IGCSE® First Language English: Summer 2015
Help us protect your right to hold public authorities to account. It is normal for exam boards to routinely review the outcomes of their grading process and to make fine adjustments where appropriate once they have analysed all of the data from the exam series. In response to those concerns, in October Ofqual reviewed the available technical evidence provided by CIE in July.
Sign in or sign up. Ultimately I’d like to know how close I might have been. Write to your politician.
Ofqual monitored the awarding of the elements of this specification in summer and reviewed the awards in autumn in the light of igcxe expressed by some schools. While we recognised that the narrow grade widths in Paper 2 were far from ideal, we found that CIE made appropriate awarding decisions and did not find that the award was unsafe.
Make a request Browse requests View authorities Journalist?
aqa igcse english language grade boundaries
McKenzie 25 January Delivered. Are you the owner of any commercial copyright on this page? We concluded there was no case to re-open the award. Grade Boundaries University of Cambridge.
A site to help anyone submit a Freedom of Information request. For summerCIE proposed to tighten their grade standards.
CIE told us that they intended to tighten their grade standards at C and, to a lesser extent, at A.